Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I agree that this should probably be in the Style settings. Most companies don't switch back and forth, so they will either use Alpha all the time, or Numeric all the time. For something that is generally used that way, it doesn't make much sense to have to select these settings every time a revision table is placed.
In the meantime, you can reduce the pain of the current setup slightly by placing revision table (with the desired index settings) in your template file. That way it already exists when you start a new drawing, so you get to skip the placement process entirely.
I agree that alpha or numerical needs to be selectable. A good place would be in application options, drawings tab. There is room beneath the "Capacity Performance" section for another small section; maybe something like "Revision Table Index" with a check box for either "Alpha" or "Numeric".
Its been done like this since 2009. No matter the up votes - it will probably be done like this tomorrow. But count this as an up vote to get this functionality.
Autodesk - y'all... come on. You have the ability to do so many cool things, but, sometimes miss the little details like defining revision style through standard styles library. Maybe for Inventor 2022.2???
Another nice option would be ability to automatically define primary or secondary revision levels. Example: A1, A2, B1.
This is very beneficial for drawing revisions that are otherwise mundane (adding missed dimension or callout, etc.) where upping the revision letter wouldn't necessarily.
Agree with what was said here. this "alpha"/"number" checker should be in rev tbl style. what is the point to have "style" of something if you still need to change parameters manually later??
I have multiple different customers, every single one uses alpha, not numeric revision index. This just needs adding to the revision table style options in styles, surely??